What is “Admissible Evidence” for a Hypothesis?

We noticed last time that “science” is unwilling to allow for an intelligent designer, no matter where the facts are leading. I say “unwilling” rather than “unable” because I think the rules that govern the permissibility of evidence in science are questionable or unintentionally biased. But let’s be fair. Scientists are proud of science being…

Read More

Science Shortchanges Intelligent Design

Science, Intelligent Design and Self Imposed Limitations Kansas State University immunologist Scott Todd said, “Even if all the facts point to an intelligent designer, such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic.” Todd S.C., correspondence to Nature 401(6752):423, 30 Sept. 1999. The question that comes to my mind is, shouldn’t Science…

Read More